feat: @discordjs/redis-gateway #9541
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git 鈫楋笌 |
didinele
force-pushed
the
feat/discord-redis-gateway
branch
from
cc74ecb
to
cfbd679
Compare
didinele
force-pushed
the
feat/discord-redis-gateway
branch
from
dbdd44d
to
73ba97a
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9541 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 58.64% 58.65% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 226 226
Lines 14790 14786 -4
Branches 1132 1132
==========================================
Hits 8673 8673
+ Misses 6077 6073 -4
Partials 40 40
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 1 file with indirect coverage changes 馃摚 We鈥檙e building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
didinele
force-pushed
the
feat/discord-redis-gateway
branch
from
73ba97a
to
66497f1
Compare
Co-authored-by: Jiralite <33201955+Jiralite@users.noreply.github.com>
| await api.interactions.reply(interaction.id, interaction.token, { content: 'Pong!', flags: MessageFlags.Ephemeral }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| await gateway.init('work_balancing_group', [GatewayDispatchEvents.InteractionCreate]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not a blocker but is there any way to listen to all events without needing to pass them all in (or hacking it in via Object.values(GatewayDispatchEvents))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no, but i dont really see when you'd want that either way if you're using a message broker, the point is to split things up depending on functionality and specifically what events said functionality needs
Co-authored-by: Vlad Frangu <kingdgrizzle@gmail.com>
Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:
new package pog
馃 Generated by Copilot at 73ba97a
few notes:
core's newGateway